It's very good, but is
it the best Star Trek episode ever? No. Although your opinion
may differ. (For what it's worth I'm aware of the complicated
background to the episode and the arguments down the years about the
rewriting of Harlan Ellison's script by then story editor Steven W.
Carabatsos, Gene L. Coon, D.C. Fontana, and Gene Roddenberry. I'm
just not going there. As with The Alternative Factor what
counts is what appears on screen; and hopefully that's the only time
The Alternative Factor gets
grouped with The City On The Edge Of Forever)
The central weakness of
the episode is Edith Keeler. There's frequently a heavy handedness to
the way her character is written as if whoever put the final draft
together felt that the woman Captain Kirk fell in love with had to be
more than extraordinary. It's not enough for her to run a
soup-kitchen and be be kind and generous and compassionate. Edith is
also written as if she had a direct line to the future. At the
Twenty-First Street Mission she gives a speech after the evening
meal. “Now I don't pretend to tell you how to find happiness and
love when every day is just a struggle to survive, but I do insist
that you do survive because the days and the years ahead are worth
living for. One day soon man is going to be able to harness
incredible energies, maybe even the atom. Energies that could
ultimately hurl us to other worlds in some sort of spaceship. And the
men that reach out into space will be able to find ways to feed the
hungry millions of the world and to cure their diseases. They will be
able to find a way to give each man hope and a common future, and
those are the days worth living for. Our deserts will bloom.”
When
Spock and Leila fall in love in This Side Of Paradise
the relationship works precisely because it is not presented to us as The Romance Of The Century. They are simply two people who make each
other happy. By contrast Edith's speech above is just unsubtle, and
obvious. It's the same problem which affects The Corbomite Maneuver and Court Martial the need to compress
maximum information into the minimum amount of time. In those two
episodes the result was Navigator Bailey the universe's most
incompetent bridge officer, and rambling madman Ben Finney. In The
City On The Edge Of Forever the
script beats the audience over the head with Edith's qualities. The
audience is supposed to be surprised Kirk falls in love with Keeler,
after that speech it would be more surprising if he didn't.
Another
weakness with the speech is the way it is played. Either Joan
Collins, or Joseph Pevney the director, has decided the speech should
be played with hesitancy. A literal transcription of the speech would
look like this. “One day.. soon... man.. is going to be able to
harness.. incredible energies... maybe even the atom.... Energies
that could ultimately hurl us to other worlds in... in.. some sort of
spaceship... And the men that reach out into space will be able to
find WAYS! to feed the hungry millions of the world and to cure their
diseases.” The effect of playing that speech with pauses is to make
it sound as if she is making it up on the spur of the moment. Yet one
of the other people using the mission tells Kirk, and the audience,
that listening to Edith talk is how they always pay for their meal.
The intent of the speech, that Kirk should be captivated by Edith's
rock-solid belief in a better future, and the delivery, hesitant and
uncertain, undercut each other. It looks like Kirk falls in love with
her because she talks about atomic power and spaceships. It gives the
impression he'd have fallen in love with any science-fiction writer.
To
be fair, the writing for Keeler is a lot sharper elsewhere in the
script, such as the exchange when she first meets Kirk, and Spock,
who have snuck into the mission basement.
KIRK:
Excuse us, miss. We didn't mean to trespass. It's cold outside.
EDITH:
A lie is a poor way to say hello. It isn't that cold.
That's how you write a
character who is intelligent and not afraid to stand up for
themselves. That's a believable character for Kirk to fall in love
with, someone who isn't afraid to challenge his poor behaviour when
they first meet. The same is true later in the episode when it's made
clear Kirk and Edith share a core philosophy.
EDITH:...
I think that one day they'll take all the money they spend now on war
and death
KIRK:
And make them spend it on life?
EDITH:
Yes. You see the same things that I do. We speak the same language.
Unfortunately for
William Shatner and Joan Collins This Side Of Paradise has
already set the bar for romance in Star Trek. Both Shatner and
Collins are charismatic and likeable, but neither of them are able to
act at the same level as Leonard Nimoy and Jill Ireland. The City
On The Edge Of Forever has no equivalent of the transporter room
scene where Leila realises she has lost Spock for a second time. When
Shatner and Collins have the screen to themselves they never capture
that same intensity. The friendship between Kirk and Spock, and the
joy when Kirk and Spock are reunited with McCoy, are more convincing
and better played. However, having said that, there is a lovely
moment, both scripted and acted, as Spock and Kirk review Edith's
potential future.
KIRK: The President and Edith Keeler.
KIRK: The President and Edith Keeler.
SPOCK:
It would seem unlikely, Jim. A few moments ago, I read a 1930
newspaper article.
KIRK:
We know her future. Within six years from now, she'll become very
important. Nationally famous
Shatner perfectly
captures Kirk's pride at the idea of Edith meeting FDR. As if he
believes history itself is giving her a stamp of approval and
validating all those qualities he sees in her.
There's
also a pleasing attention to detail with the other characters. Just
before using the Guardian Kirk
orders Scotty, “when you think you've waited long enough. Each of
you will have to try it. Even if you fail, at least you'll be alive
in some past world somewhere.” It's a small moment but by showing
us Kirk thinking about his crew it brings the characters to life. As
do exchanges like this one.
MCCOY:
Some heart flutter. Better risk a few drops of cordrazine.
KIRK:
Tricky stuff. Are you sure you want to risk [The hypo hisses and Sulu
opens his eyes.]
MCCOY:
You were about to make a medical comment, Jim?
KIRK:
Who, me, Doctor?
And
for a script which is so unsubtle about Edith Keeler, there's a
delicacy to the way it introduces the audience to the idea of using
the Guardian to travel in time, and alter the past. Right before
McCoy escapes into history
Kirk asks Spock if they could take McCoy back to the day before and
avoid the accidental overdoes of cordrazine. That one line, and
Spock's reply about the difficulty of stepping through on a specific
day seeds the audience with the idea that the Guardian can be used to
travel in time, and alter history, and that it is a difficult and
dangerous process.
What
also surprises about the script is the pacing. Edith Keeler's big
introductory speech takes place 22 minutes into a 48 minute episode.
This is a story packed with incident and yet the episode never feels
rushed. McCoy accidentally overdoses
on cordrazine and
goes insane. A mysterious artefact allows travel into the past (and
presumably the future). History must be restored to the correct path.
Adventures in 1930s New York. Kirk falls in love. Another writer
could have built an entire script just from the idea of a race
against time manhunt for a temporarily insane McCoy on the surface of
a dead planet. There is almost enough material in here for two or
three separate episodes. This is a common factor with several of the
better episodes of Star Trek: The Corbomite Manouver, Arena, This
Side Of Paradise, The Devil In The Dark. It's not exclusively true.
Some good stories are quite spartan in comparison, Balance Of Terror for example, but it often does seem to be a
common factor that good stories pack in material. By contrast
disappointing stories like The Alternative Factor or The Return Of The Archons tend to overextend a single idea. The Alternative Factor
mainly involves Kirk getting more and more annoyed with Lazarus,
until he realises Lazarus is two separate people, and blows up their
spaceship trapping the pair forever.
Once
again Joseph Peveny puts in solid work as director. Location filming
on the Desilu
backlot, seen in Miri
and The
Return Of The Archons, uses
tight camera angles, clever
use of extras, and period vehicles to bring the streets to life. All
this background detail came at a cost, the total budget for this
episode was $245,316, compared to the series average of around
$190,000. Look at the tracking shot as Kirk and Spock run away from
the Policeman, there are a lot of extras on set. Plus, some simple
but effective use of sound effects with the noise of a dog barking.
Edith's death is well staged. It's filmed at night and nicely
foreshadowed when Kirk and Edith head off to the cinema. As they step
into the road a car screeches to a halt and Kirk pulls Edith back.
Film
editor James D. Ballas puts together an effective sequence for
Edith's date with destiny. An unusual optical zoom is used to pull
sharply into Kirk's shocked face, and Edith's as she walks across the
road. The choice of shots is also interesting. The obvious way to
play the sequence would be to concentrate on Shatner's face, and have
him react to off screen noises; a squeal of breaks, a thump, and
maybe shouts of alarm. Instead Peveny, or Ballas, goes for the
opposite approach. As Kirk holds McCoy he faces away from the camera,
it's McCoy's reactions which tell us what is happening, and then we
cut to a wider shot showing Edith dead in the road with people
running to help. We don't see Kirk's face until the accident is
completely over, when the enormity of what he has done has sunk in.
Even when he releases McCoy, Kirk never looks round at Edith's body.
Kirk walks towards a wall and leans on it, still not looking round,
and we fade to the Guardian's planet, and then Kirk, Spock, and McCoy
returning. There is lovely passage of time in those three shots. The
audience never finds out how long it has been since the accident,
although Kirk and Spock have had time to change out of the civilian
clothes they wore in 1930s New York. There's very little dialogue,
there doesn't need to be. Kirk's silence, and final line, tells us
all we need to know.
Enterprise
crew deaths: None, again.
Running
total: 26
No comments:
Post a Comment