Confession time. When I last watched the Star Trek DVDs I skipped episodes.
Not often. Just occasionally. Only the episodes I already knew I
didn't like. Miri and The Conscience Of The King both
went unwatched. There were others but it's probably not wise
to name them as the list includes at least one second series stone-cold fan favourite. I haven't changed my opinions on any episode so far. Miri
and The Conscience Of The King still
both sit pretty far down my list of favourites, and I don't
hold much hope for The Alternative Factor when I get there in
three episodes.
It's pretty obvious where this is going. One of the skipped episodes was This Side Of Paradise. It sat in my memory labelled as boring. The one where Spock falls in love. Bleugh. Who wants to see that? Spock's babe will be backlit and shot through a vaseline smeared lens, to make her look “beautiful”. The episode will be dubbed with that sappy lurve music. Skip it! Jump straight from A Taste Of Armageddon to The Devil In The Dark.
It's pretty obvious where this is going. One of the skipped episodes was This Side Of Paradise. It sat in my memory labelled as boring. The one where Spock falls in love. Bleugh. Who wants to see that? Spock's babe will be backlit and shot through a vaseline smeared lens, to make her look “beautiful”. The episode will be dubbed with that sappy lurve music. Skip it! Jump straight from A Taste Of Armageddon to The Devil In The Dark.
Fine,
so I'm an idiot. But on a broader scale, This Side Of
Paradise seems to be one of the
more overlooked Star Trek
episodes. When it was rewritten writer Jerry Sohl had his name removed because he was
unhappy with the result. Director Ralph Senensky has a
website where he talks about being booked to direct The
Devil In The Dark and being
disappointed when he was sent the script for This Side Of
Paradise along with a note
telling him the episodes had been switched. As he says, “THE DEVIL IN THE DARK was a strange, eerie script,
totally different from anything I had directed, while THIS SIDE OF
PARADISE, although it was science fiction, was not really new
territory for me.” Maybe Senensky nails the problem right there.
This Side Of Paradise
is a love story between Spock and Leila Kalomi. Star Trek is an
action-adventure science fiction series. The whole ethos of Star Trek
is, “to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new
civilizations.” Why is the series telling a love story? Any show
can tell a love story.
Worse,
it's a love story for Mr. Spock. If a writer is stuck for a story one
easy solution is to break an element of the series. What happens when
the transporter breaks down? What happens if the warp drive
malfunctions at a critical moment? What happens if the shuttle
crashes? In the case of Spock the easiest way to break the character
is to force him to experience emotions. "Spock falls in love," seems
like the most obvious story someone could pitch. Even worse, Spock doesn't fall in love unaided, he gets high on spores which break down his emotional barriers. So we
have a science fiction show doing a story you can find in any
television series, with the most obvious character, a script the original writer
disliked enough to want to use a pseudonym, and it's a rip off of The Naked Time. Not the most
inspiring combination.
You would think everyone would have more faith in D. C. Fontana; who rewrote Jerry Sohl's story. She has a proven track record for making stories work. Charlie X is an intelligent, thoughtful story. Tomorrow Is Yesterday makes workable the second most obvious pitch, “hey, what if the Enterprise turned out to be one of those UFOs we keep reading about.” This Side Of Paradise is her best script so far. Spot on pacing means each of the four acts tells a different part of the story. Act one is the mystery. Why are the colonists alive when they should be dead? Act two is the complication. The bulk of Spock's love story is here, and Kirk has to deal with his command falling apart. Act three is Kirk's lowest point, stalking the empty Enterprise and being infected himself, and the turnaround when he discovers the cure. Finally act four is the resolution. Not only must the colonists be cured of the bliss giving spores, but Spock must deal with the fallout of his relationship with Leila. And if the pacing is good the structure is better. This Side Of Paradise tells two stories simultaneously; one about Spock's love story the other about Kirk dealing with the loss of his command. Although this is remembered as Spock's love story it's Kirk who keeps the plot moving forwards. It's actually a surprise to see how little romance this love story contains. This Side Of Paradise turns out to be a textbook example of how a story should be shaped around the lead actor, while also giving memorable scenes to the supporting leads.
Small
moments of dialogue are used to tell us about the characters. Leila uses
McCoy's communicator to call Spock, unaware that he has broken the
spore's influence.
LEILA:
You are all right, aren't you?
SPOCK:
Yes. Yes. I'm quite well.
There
are whole worlds of meaning in Spock's simple line. His awkward
attempt to recreate the easy way he spoke to Leila previously. Embarrassment at
having to talk about emotion. Regret. A desire not to let Leila
suspect he is no longer affected by the spores. He is also attempting not to hurt or worry her, and put off the difficult
emotional confrontation he knows is coming.
These small moments alternate with bigger scenes. Most memorably Kirk's attempt to drive Spock into a fury which contains some surprisingly brutal lines.
These small moments alternate with bigger scenes. Most memorably Kirk's attempt to drive Spock into a fury which contains some surprisingly brutal lines.
KIRK:
All right, you mutinous, disloyal, computerised, half-breed, we'll
see about you deserting my ship.
SPOCK:
The term half-breed is somewhat applicable, but computerised is
inaccurate. A machine can be computerised, not a man.
KIRK:
What makes you think you're a man? You're an overgrown jackrabbit, an
elf with a hyperactive thyroid.
SPOCK:
Jim, I don't understand.
KIRK:
Of course you don't understand. You don't have the brains to
understand. All you have is printed circuits.
SPOCK:
Captain, if you'll excuse me.
KIRK:
What can you expect from a simpering, devil-eared freak whose father
was a computer and his mother an encyclopedia?
SPOCK:
My mother was a teacher. My father an ambassador.
KIRK:
Your father was a computer, like his son. An ambassador from a planet
of traitors. A Vulcan never lived who had an ounce of integrity.
SPOCK:
Captain, please don't
KIRK:
You're a traitor from a race of traitors. Disloyal to the core,
rotten like the rest of your subhuman race, and you've got the gall
to make love to that girl.
SPOCK:
That's enough.
KIRK:
Does she know what she's getting, Spock? A carcass full of memory
banks who should be squatting in a mushroom, instead of passing
himself off as a man? You belong in a circus, Spock, not a starship.
Right next to the dog-faced boy.
William
Shatner, as you'd expect, eats up the screen during this scene. He's
having a whale of a time. His best moment comes after the, “right
next to the dog faced boy” line when his expression in close-up is
a perfect mixture of hope and fear; hope that he's made Spock angry
enough to counter the spores, and fear that he's gone too far. But
it's not just Shatner who has raised his game. While William Shatner
has the charisma to be a leading man Leonard Nimoy is the better
actor, and teamed with Jill Ireland as Leila the result is brilliant. The work they do in the act two romance scenes makes them believable.
Nimoy plays his scenes carefully, and the result is
recognisably Spock in love; the same character, but different. Another actor might have just
started smiling and looking all dewy-eyed. When
the romance plot drops out of sight in act three it stays in the
memory, allowing it to be picked up again in act four, and for Spock
to end the episode by dropping the series' most devastating line, “I
have little to say about it, Captain, except that for the first time
in my life I was happy.”
The
scene between Spock and Leila in the transporter room may be the best
in the series so far. As Leila realises she has lost Spock she turns
away, and begins crying, and Ralph Senensky shoots much of the scene
with Leila facing away from Spock so we can see both of their faces
with a minimum of cutting between camera angles. This allows the
scene to play out as a single take so Nimoy and Ireland can both
respond to the others performance. Wisely, Leila does not appear in
the episode after this scene is finished. It would cheapen the story
to see her hanging around in the background red-eyed, or to have a
goodbye scene going over the same emotional territory. Also, in the
transporter room scene there is something poetic about Leila being
the only person to lose the spores through despair, rather than anger
as everyone else does. Especially as despair is the same emotion
which leads Kirk to become infected on the empty Enterprise bridge
after he stops being angry at his crew's behaviour and despairs over
his failure and absent crew.
The
bridge scene shows the thought Jerry Finnerman, director of
photography, is putting into the episode. As Kirk is infected Shatner
turns towards the camera and, as the spores take effect, the lighting
is subtly brightened to make Kirk's face glow. Likewise as Kirk
struggles against their effect in the transporter room and becomes
angry the lighting is turned down until Kirk is in silhouette; then Kirk switches on the transporter control panel illuminating his face with
a harsh blue light. At the same time Ralph Senensky is telling much
of the story visually. Once Kirk is free of the spores the camera
swings round to show us Kirk's suitcase on the transporter pad,
subtly emphasising how Kirk's anger was a result of preparing to
leave. Likewise the spore spraying plants are often foregrounded in
shots, most notably when Leila leads Spock to be infected and the
early part of the scene is filmed through the leaves of a plant.
Senensky, like Joesph Pevney, the director of Arena, is always
looking for ways to make shots more interesting. As Kirk and Spock
build the transmitter they are filmed through the machinery of the
communications console. And as Spock takes the awkward call from
Leila mentioned above, where she asks to come up and see the
Enterprise, Spock is foregrounded and Kirk stands in the background
listening embarrassedly. Once the call has finished the camera swings
round and the conversation continues with Kirk in the foreground and
Spock in the background.
This Side Of Paradise seems to have a sense of excitement about it. As if the cast and crew all
know they are dealing with a good script and all want to deliver the
best work possible. With Nimoy and Ireland responding to an excellent
script, Shatner raises his game. With a first time director excited
to be working on Star Trek
and looking for ways to make the episode interesting, Jerry Finnerman
uses lighting to visualise the emotional state of the crew. And the
actors respond to a production team concerned with more than just
getting the episode in the can, and in turn the production team
respond to the enthusiasm of the actors, and the whole episode is
lifted as a result. And all this from an episode I thought I
remembered as boring. Maybe there is hope for The
Alternative Factor.
Enterprise crew deaths: None, again. Six episodes without anyone dying.
Enterprise crew deaths: None, again. Six episodes without anyone dying.
Running total: 25
Associate Producer
Robert Justman and Assistant Film Editor Don Rode were in charge of
the next episode previews. The preview for This Side Of Paradise
contains a fantastically filthy innuendo. To the point I'm almost
surprised it was broadcast.
Basically, Justman and
Rode edit together two similar shots of Spock and Leila; one of the
camera zooming in on Spock, the other on Leila. The two shots are
intercut with increasing speed and followed by an abrupt cut to a
plant shooting its cloud of white spores all over Spock. Disgusting.
NBC's Standards and Practises department must have been distracted
elsewhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment