A sneaky pilot for a
series starring Robert Lansing as Gary Seven, and Teri Garr as
Roberta Lincoln. Assignment: Earth is unable to demonstrate the strengths of the proposed new series or Star Trek.
As a Star Trek
episode, Assignment: Earth
ends up being Tomorrow Is Yesterday
stripped of all the concepts which made Tomorrow Is
Yesterday the better episode.
Gone is the clever near future setting of Tomorrow Is
Yesterday, broadcast in January
1967 but set in a then undefined future just before the first mission
to the moon. Instead the opening Captain's log immediately tells us
Assignment: Earth is
intended to be contemporary, “...in the year 1968.” Gone too are
D. C. Fontana's carefully worked out solutions for getting the
Enterprise crew in and out of the story. The Enterprise has been in
1968 for some time at the start of Assignment: Earth,
and the story ends before the Enterprise heads home. Also gone is
much of the incident from Tomorrow Is Yesterday,
the increasing complications of a plot in which the Enterprise crew
know they cannot interact with 20th
century Earth, but must in order to try and resolve problems caused
by earlier interactions, which causes more problems, and so on. In
Assignment: Earth Kirk
never gets to take the lead, he and Spock spend most of the story
following Gary Seven from New York, to McKinley Rocket Base, and
back to New York.
As
the first episode of a series called Assignment: Earth,
the viewer is left with no idea of how that show would work on a
weekly basis. The concept is clearly laid out when Gary Seven
describes his mission as, “to prevent Earth's civilisation from
destroying itself before it can mature into a peaceful society,”
but what does that mean over 26 weeks? There is no antagonist in
Assignment: Earth. The
plot, such as it is, runs entirely on Kirk, and Spock not knowing if
they can trust Gary Seven, and Roberta not knowing if she can trust
Gary Seven, or Kirk and Spock. Earlier non Star Trek
drafts of the pilot featured an evil alien race called Omegans but in
the broadcast story there is no hint of any malevolent external
threat. From the pilot it seems the audience is meant to assume Gary
and Roberta will work as a team, but what we are shown on screen is
a script which keeps the pair apart. Gary Seven goes off and
sabotages the rocket while Roberta stays in New York being a quirky klutz, and saving the day by accidentally twiddling the right
knobs. There's very little opportunity to see if the pair have any
chemistry together, Gary Seven spends more screen time with Isis the
cat. Based on the episode, Assignment: Earth
the series would involve Gary Seven and Isis the cat infiltrating a
different military or scientific facility each week, and committing a
little light sabotage to highlight the danger caused by whatever
activity the facility conducted. There's also a fundamental problem
caused by the series being a Star Trek
spin off. If Gary Seven's mission is to neutralise threats to the
future then it's hard to generate jeopardy around the concept when we
have already seen that future in Star Trek.
A
big problem with the episode is that the pace of the
storytelling is glacial. In act three the following story points are
covered; Gary Seven has to sabotage the rocket; Kirk and Spock must
follow Seven to McKinley Rocket
Base; Scotty must use the resources of the Enterprise in the
hunt for Seven; and Roberta must discover Gary Seven's transporter.
Covering these story points takes 14 minutes. Worse, many of these
story points are simply delaying tactics for the plot. Kirk and Spock
follow Gary Seven to McKinley, where they are instantly arrested and
made to stand in the corner of the control room set until they can
discretely beam back to his New York apartment. The audience was
shown Gary Seven's hidden transporter in act two, so when Roberta
discovers it we are watching Roberta learn something we already know.
Even worse, four of act three's 14 minutes are NASA stock footage.
That's stock footage used as visual material in it's own right (for
example the rocket launch which takes up about a minute of screen
time), edited into viewing screens, treated with voice-overs (there's
lots of grainy film of mission control with public address style
announcements played over the picture), or featuring characters
wordlessly interacting with the footage (Gary Seven in the gantry
lift, Scotty using the transporter room viewscreen).
Some fun can be had
with the ideas behind the episode. It's difficult not to feel sorry
for John D. F. Black. All the way back in The Naked Time he
proposed a model for time travel (antimatter implosion) and the
series constantly ignores it. The second time they travel in time,
Tomorrow Is Yesterday, is an accident using the slingshot
method, the third time in The City On The Edge Of Forever it's
the Guardian of Forever, and for Assignment: Earth they're back to using
the slingshot method. Actually one point in the episode's favour is the stylish way it starts by essentially saying, "yeah we've travelled in time, deal with it."
It's also difficult to
understand what Starfleet thinks it can learn from the Enterprise's
mission. Surely there are more interesting periods for the ship to
visit? The mission might make sense if Assignement: Earth is a trial run for time travel history research and the plan was to go to a
historically insignificant time to minimise the risk of disruption,
but the script is clear that 1968 is a big deal in Earth history.
Spock has a line, “there will be an important assassination today,
an equally dangerous government coup in Asia...” but 1963 had a
more historically significant assassination and a coup in South
Vietnam. Obviously in the real world this is to flatter the viewer,
“hey kids what we're doing now matters,” but in story terms why
investigate 1968 in a series which has established the Eugenics Wars
will start in the 1990s. On a more nitpicking note, when Spock
complies his historical report for Kirk at the beginning of the
episode he describes the launch of the orbital nuclear warhead
platform as, “highly critical,” but does not mention, as Kirk
does at the end of the episode, “our record tapes show, although
not generally revealed, that on this date, a malfunctioning
suborbital warhead was exploded exactly one hundred and four miles
above the Earth.” It seems odd for Spock to miss that important
point out of the briefing he gives to Kirk. Perhaps we can write this
off as history changing around the events of the episode but the big
lesson of The City On The Edge Of Forever is that even the
tiniest change can have unforeseen consequences.
One real mystery of Assignment: Earth is that this episode turns out to be the most expensive Star Trek story made. According to a post at the Trek BBS website the final cost of Assignment: Earth was $288,049.00, easily beating the final $250,396.71 cost of The City On The Edge Of Forever. To put it bluntly, the episode doesn't look that expensive. The City On The Edge Of Forever had night location filming on the Desilu backlot with vehicles and extras dressed appropriately for the period, as well as some large studio sets, and a big one-off piece of scenery in the form of the Guardian. By comparison Assignment: Earth has a couple of ambitious effects shots which add a rocket to location footage filmed on the Paramount lot, but there's very little else which would seem to account for the money bar some location filming with a lot of extras to look like New York crowds. Maybe there were a lot of additional behind the scenes costs to do with making a pilot as part of an ongoing series?
Enterprise crew deaths: None again
Running total: 46
Truly bewildering that this episode should have cost so much to make. As you quite rightly point out, it's not evident on-screen, unless those various overlay shots (featuring NASA footage, etc) were expensive to produce. Certainly the New York street scenes (and Seven's office) can't have cost all that much. Robert Lansing was a star of some serious heft at this time (especially coming off the lead in "Twelve O'Clock High,"), so it's possible his fee was disproportionately high. Or maybe they spent an inordinate amount on story and script development. No, the only explanation that makes sense is that Desilu, or Paramount, or Roddenberry, or some combination of all three, took the opportunity to "bury" some costs, perhaps overruns from previous episodes. This makes sense when you consider that this was going to be the last season (until NBC reconsidered), and the idea presumably was that the new series would replace the old (if it got "picked up"). This would have been everyone's opportunity to "balance the books," using the new-series development money that NBC would have fronted the studio. On the other hand, who knows? Maybe they built some sets they never used, although I've never read nor heard anything about any of that.
ReplyDelete